Monday Fisheries Headlines 8/13
Sign reported(?) on door of Calhoun Street fisheries building in Juneau: BEAT IT, WE'RE CLOSED! Do we dare hope? One of the "proprietors" was recently charged by the State Troopers with having an unlicensed crewman on his boat.
Launching a robot from the "Esperanza" to take videos of areas of the Bering Sea where trawlers have been.
Groundswell Fisheries Movement is starting to take an active look at the new Farm Bill. Fishermen are now considered peers of farmers and could stand to gain much if the stars in this Bill line up for them. (This is a hint to Alaska's Congressional delegation. Their recent actions now allow a fisherman to process up to 10,000 lbs of catch a week without major red tape.) I wonder if the Petersburg Economic Development Department will recognize these fishermen as processors now that the Feds do.
Here's good reason for fishing village business owners to pay attention to federal fisheries management.
Maine now has restrictions on taking marine related property out of service for marine use and that means the owners can't make a killing selling it to whoever has the most money anymore. For good reason. But there is the problem that the federal fisheries management councils don't operate efficiently like a corporation. Not even like the Military. More like the Clan of the Cave Bear. I didn't read the book, it just sounded primitive is all. So maybe the owners of the property around boat harbors should do what they should have all along, that is, weigh in on policies like "rationalization" which shrink the fleet and favor mega-vessels who can deliver a long ways away.
This article is a good account of what it looks like if you walk around the harbor, but the important underlying causes are never mentioned. Again we see reporters just saying "decline of the fishing industry," like it's something that falls out of the sky. It's funny sometimes seeing some people in the industry confusing "trollers" with "trawlers," which is so common with politicians and other landlubbers. The effect on communities of key people keeping their heads in the sand practically makes me cry.
The Discovery Channel wants us to learn about the importance of a healthy marine environment.
A special called Deep Blue is premiering this week. It's about the deep oceans. I have a hard time seeing the "big picture" in these specials because of the emphasis on visual effects and simplistic dialogue geared for the young. You won't see underwater footage of a mega-trawler scooping up fish, and the bottom too, in one of their films, which has much more influence on the ecosystem than everything else combined.
Greenpeace is getting footage of what it looks like AFTER the trawlers have gone through an area. Maybe if they can photograph the trawler up ahead of them, then jump to a live feed from the bathysphere and then to an area not touched by a bottom trawl, we'd see what is really going on. Remember, Oregon studies show that 30% of the species complex is wiped out from bottom trawling. Great way to leave the continental shelf for our kids and grand-kids.
Logging takes new form.
I don't usually delve into other industries, but this article sounded like some folks in British Columbia are making sense, and there was a big article on the Tongass in S.E. Alaska in the July issue of National Geographic. The Tongass issue is becoming one of "how much say does the public have in ecosystem preservation?" This has a bearing on "how much say does the public have on marine ecosystem preservation?" Since most all of the U.S. public lives in big cities, does it matter if a few Congressmen let a few big companies make a pile of money screwing up the "out-of-sight" parts of America?
Given the way Congress has it fixed, the taxpayer could just pay every timber worker in S.E. Alaska $142,000 a year to stay home. The big advantage is that the very complex old-growth ecosystem would be saved. Everything else in the equation would be equal. I did a report on this with my son on old growth forests in Oregon and it was a real eye-opener. I grew up in the Tongass not having an opinion one way or the other on cutting the old growth. But I couldn't go back and hunt in areas that they logged, that was for sure.
The stuff is hitting the fan for fisheries managers to consider the crewmen.Well, the response was not exactly timely as I understand from further copies of correspondence. But then we didn't even know who this woman was when she was appointed. We don't hold that against the Governor, but there is some expectation of response through the usual channels of governance, not through some council.
Greetings Miss Crome,(the fisheries advisor to the Governor of Alaska)
I've attached the endorsement letter for the Governor, the
proposal for the Bering Sea Crab Crewmen's Cooperative, and
February 2007 testimony to the NPFMC.
The Crewman's Association is sponsoring the BSCCC
reallocation proposal; we
have submitted our proposal as a basis for future FMP
changes for all US
fisheries, as crewmen are the true laborers/harvesters in
fishing industry. I have not attached the 30 pages of
which we will use as basis for judicial review and for the
review crab rationalization.
I will refer you to page 17 of 30, National Standard #4
section C (3)
Factors in making allocations
(i) Fairness and equity. (A) An allocation of fishing
privileges should be
rationally connected to the achievement of OY or with the
furtherance of a
legitimate FMP objective. Inherent in an allocation is the
one group to the detriment of another. THE MOTIVE FOR
MAKING A PARTICULAR
ALLOCATION SHOULD BE JUSTIFIED IN TERMS OF THE OBJECTIVE OF
OTHERWISE, THE DISADVANTAGED USER GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS
WOULD SUFFER WITHOUT
CAUSE. FOR INSTANCE, AN FMP OBJECTIVE TO PRESERVE [page 36]
STATUS QUO CANNOT BE ACHIEVED BY EXCLUDING A GROUP OF
IN THE FISHERY. On the other hand, there is a rational
an objective of harvesting shrimp at their maximum size and
nursery area to trawling.
(iii) Avoidance of excessive shares. An allocation scheme
must be designed
to deter any person or other entity from acquiring an
excessive share of
fishing privileges, and to avoid creating conditions
control, by buyer or sellers, that would not otherwise
We will have a complete packet ready for future legal
review. We have made
contact with Congress and submitted the same documents.
We'll be sending a
delegation to D.C. this Fall to work on new legislation to
rationalization for the crewmen of the BS/AI crab
We appreciate that you will be conferring with Commissioner
Lloyd and then
provide Governor Palin with all of these documents.
We look forward to a timely response from your office, as
well as the
Governor's endorsement of our proposal.
Shawn C. Dochtermann